Leila Leoncavallo, Founder
Welcome to CivicsEd
a provider of interactive civics and applied psychology seminars for children and adults. 

Teaching should encompass much more than conveying factual knowledge; it should be an interactive process that fosters critical thinking, ignites interest, and encourages the application of knowledge into action. 

Today's generation of students are growing up with an encyclopedia (aka "a cellphone") at their fingertips. It is essential that they learn how to use this information carefully and critically. 

My learning goals for my students are to achieve solid understanding through an interactive process, to think critically about the subject matter, and apply their knowledge to real life issues.

                                            ~Leila Leoncavallo


New Applied Psychology Classes begin January 2017!

Free Webinar!

Teaching Social Studies to Dyslexic Students Through Strengths
Presented by Leila Leoncavallo, Founder of Fairfax Dyslexia and CivicsEd.com
Hosted by Dyslexic Advantage

Hot Topics:

I'd love to hear what you think about these issues...

Can protesters who burn the American flag be prosecuted? Read the First Amendment:  

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. 

Now watch this video. What do you think? Do you agree with the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment? 

Are presidential debates informative? Or do they "seriously distort democracy" as this article suggests? 

Which presidential candidate do you support in the 2016 election? 
Check out CSPAN classroom for election-related lessons and videos.

Can states ban same-sex marriage? In a controversial 5-4 decision (Obergefell v. Hodges) on June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court said no. For a good "translation" of the decision, read this analysis by Amy Howe at Scotusblog.

Are threatening statements made on social media protected by the First Amendment? On December 1, 2014, the Supreme Court heard argument in the case of a Pennsylvania man who ranted on Facebook about killing his wife and others. He argued that this was not a threat, but an artistic expression of anger, similar to some rap lyrics? Was this a real threat, and therefore not protected by the First Amendment? How can we tell? Should the standard be whether the speaker intended the comment as a threat, or whether the recipient felt threatened? 

Listen to the Supreme Court argument in Elonis v. United States here. How do you think the Supreme Court decided the case? The Court decided the case on June 1, 2015. You can read the Court's opinion here

Does the Fourth Amendment apply to border searches?  The Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled on March 8, 2013 that it does (U.S. v. Cotterman).  Read this commentary.  Do you agree?

How should freedom of religion apply in public schools? Consider this real life example: A six-year old student wrote this poem to honor her grandfather's service in the Vietnam War:  "...He prayed to God for peace, he prayed to God for strength..." When the child was to read her poem at a Veteran's Day school assembly, she was told that she could not say the word God. Read about the story here.  What do you think?

Is anonymous online speech protected?
Read and consider this before making an anonymous posting. 

Should affirmative action continue?
In 2003, the Supreme Court held (5-4) that an applicant's race may be one factor among many to be considered in a university's efforts to achieve diversity (Grutter v. Bollinger). 

On October 10, 2012, the Supreme Court reconsidered the issue of affirmative action. Click here to listen to oral argument in Fisher v. University of Texas and here for Professors Carolyn Shapiro and Sheldon Nahmod discussing the case.  Read the Court opinion here.  

On October 15, 2013, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action about whether the 14th Amendment requires states to consider race when making decisions. The Court's decision was announced on April 22, 2014. Read the Court opinion here.

Can a public school punish a student for comments posted online and after school hours?
Although students have free speech rights in school and off-campus, schools can punish or restrict speech that is disruptive. But what if that speech takes place online after school hours? Ken Paulson, President of the First Amendment Center, writes of a recent case.

Is "liking" something on Facebook protected free speech? 
Virginia judge said no. But the Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit disagreed.  Watch two attorneys debate the issue here

Should the electoral college be abolished?  Watch this entertaining and informative video.  

Do we have too much free speech...or not enough?  Watch students discuss the issue with three Supreme Court justices.